they’d probably look a lot like A4U Expo.
Just a few short weeks back we were commenting on posts that claimed the US was 18 months ahead of the UK in it’s affiliate marketing. I think we’ve put that one to bed this week. The quality of the sessions was extremely high with some of the UK’s top players freely dishing out up-to-the-minute practical advice, and the comments and questions from the floor showed that the attendees really got to grips with some complex issues.
Every major network had turned out in force to support the show and sniping between them was at a minimum, everyone far too busy dealing with their own business and for once talking about strengths rather than others’ weaknesses. Two of my favourite sessions were Affiliate Future’s Maz Darvish on “Lessons Learnt from the Travel Sector”, and Tradedoubler’s Andreas Bernström on “The Next Big Thing”. David Hall of Affiliate Window did a solid job of defending the role of the network in his session, but the biggest winner of that debate in my view was Clarke Duncan from Paid on Results who got a telling off for not doing enough to tell the world about their great content technology, showing the respect that affiliates have for smaller networks as long as they have something unique to offer.
As someone who has struck out with their own business in the last 12 months, I also picked up some great tips from the Super Affiliates session, where Kieron Donoghue and Duncan Jennings debated the pro’s and cons of building a company vs the one-man-ban-approach. The lifestyle choices in this decision also came up again in Duncan’s session on selling your business.
The event was smoothly run with all the mod cons a show like this needs. Even the slightly dodgy signposting within Excel was coped with by numerous helpful venue staff. The A4U events have moved up in professionalism in a big way over the last couple of years, and they found a whole new gear, and a turbo boost too for this event.
Evident among the conversations was how much personal relationships have shaped the UK industry. Individuals and companies sat together on panels with their competitors without indulging in tedious sniping, but instead focussing on issues that will help us all move forward and grow our businesses.
With the key players in the cashback business now coming together to form a ‘Loyalty Marketing’Â association, it is now a genuine possibility that more separate affiliate marketing bodies will spring up to cope with the issues that each sector faces. My view is that this is a good thing, showing the size and maturity of those sectors, but a role still remains for an overall association to lobby on issues such as spyware, and to promote the industry as a whole to make sure we get the biggest possible share of marketing budgets.
More than ever, affiliate marketing in the UK feels like a cohesive and professional industry, rather than a collection of businesses with their own agendas and we should thank all those who gave their precious time and expertise this week for helping that feeling grow.
Popularity: 11% [?]
[…] Lee Stephen Jess Kirsty […]
Hi Stephen, I don’t think we’ve met, maybe next time. Was interested to read your news about a Loyalty Association and wondering if code sites should go the same route - or indeed if the loyalty association could be extended to cover codes too.
[…] Now whilst sitting here with my pint of tea I was reading one particular blog from Stephen Pratley. […]
[…] For other views on the Expo, then try Paul, Kieron (I smiled twice!), Keith, Jess (sorry, didn’t see you!), Lee (sorry, didn’t see you either), Morley Mouse (ditto), Stephen (erm, ditto again!). These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages. […]
Hi Joe,
I believe the Loyalty association is there to combat some issue that aren’t really related to discount code sites. there are a small minority of sites who incentivise offers without the advertisers knowing, so for example, people are getting paid for requesting catalogues with no real intention of ever buying.
The discount codes sector has a fairly distinct set of issues of its own.
I’m not involved in the loyalty association at the moment, but I’m sure any of the members of that panel could point you in the right direction.
I wouldn’t say Affiliates who use many Networks where giving me a “telling off” for not doing enough to let the world know about what great technology, I think like me they are a little frustrated that Paid On Results have some great technology and bring many of the industry firsts to the table, yet we lack the investment for big budget media campaigns to have articles and adverts to promote these to “brands” via the likes of NMA and Revolution. It is often the case that only the real experts in Affiliate Marketing know about Paid On Results, use Paid On Results and make good money from them be it Affiliates, Merchants or Agencies and it’s the less clued up folk who simply read a few magazines and think they know it all, like David Hall and his applauding view that you have to be a big “branded” Network to have good technology, this simply tells me that David has no right to be in his current role of IAB chairman for the Affiliate Marketing Council because he has very one sided wrong view that you need to be “branded” to offer great technology.
Anyway expect Paid On Results to be shouting out more and more about the great technology we have to offer and once we actually get the right investment the other “branded” Networks had better watch out because if we are this good with very little money just wait until you see what we can do with real investment
I’d agree with you completely that great advertising doesn’t make a great network. The individuals whose heads turned your way when that comment was made are people I have a lot of respect for and I’ve heard POR described as ‘underrated’ and ‘the industry’s best kept secret’ on more than one occasion.
You must be an attractive prospect for an investor right now so I’m looking forward to a big noise.